Search This Blog

Wednesday 31 January 2007

Sea Launch Rocket explodes on pad

Just in case you thought you were having a bad day, spare a thought for the Sea Launch folks.



"The Sea Launch Zenit 3SL vehicle, carrying the NSS 8 satellite, experienced an anomaly today during launch operations"

Sea Launch are obviously punting for understatement of the year there, which is forgivable I suppose given the mess they now have to clean up.

Video is up on YouTube
. (What would we do without it).

Sunday 28 January 2007

Freedom to Tinker » Blog Archive » 2007 Predictions

It's very late to be linking to sets of predictions for the year but I just came across Ed Felten and the Freedom to Tinker crew's 2007 forecast and they are well worth a look.
Freedom to Tinker » Blog Archive » 2007 Predictions

Saturday 20 January 2007

Six things I'd like to see in Google Reader.

I really like Google Reader - it has allowed me to expand the number of feeds that I can read and it provides me with an interface that allows me to do that much faster and with more control than before. I seem to be reading somewhere between 1.5million and 3 million words a month via its interface - that's about the same as 15-30 novels - so it must be pretty good. However there are a couple of things that I'd really like to see added or changed.

[1] Search and Filters. Apart from the simple madness of the fact that this is a Google product for gathering data that doesn't have Search built in there is much more that I want than a simple search box. A Custom Search Engine based on your feed list OPML can be a partial solution but a built in "Search and Do something" facility is top of my list of sought after changes. I would really like to be able to search my "feedspace" and treat the result like a labeled set of items. I could then:
  • Search and read the items (obviously).
  • Search and mark the item(s) (as read, unread, with a new label, for sharing etc...).
  • Search and mark (as read\as unread\ with a label) the source feed(s).
  • Save the search as a dynamic label so that new articles would automatically get added if they met the search criteria.
  • Search and mail. Ideally used with the aforementioned dynamic labels. I could then use Reader to keep an eye out for really important stuff and send a mail to my phone when something I'm really interested in pops up.
[2] Some clarity and development on the role of Labels. Are they "Item Labels" (where they function as tags on individual articles and are applied individually to articles - starring and sharing items is biased towards this view of Labels) or "Feed Labels" (where the Labels serve as general purpose desriptors that apply a management hierarchy to your subscriptions and are automatically applied to each new item that arrives). The interface is very unclear at the moment about what the differences are between the two views, if any. I see these as separate things with some common aspects and would like to see a change that made that fact clear but I'd be happy for someone to teach me why I'm wrong.

[3] Automated detection and removal of dupes across different feeds. I see identical articles in many feeds (e.g. the Engadget PDA feed often contains items that are also in the Engadget GPS feed). Once such a dupe is read in one spot it should be marked as read everywhere even if the feed source is not identical. Clearly some care needs to be taken with this but it's the sort of incremental intelligence that Google is usually brilliant at so I have hope.

[4] Mobile interface. I use the mobile interface more than anyone else I'm aware of and I love it. Unlike others I find that the current ultra minimalist interface design is almost perfect for me for the simple browsers and cramped screens on my mobile devices but I want to see a handful of extra features.
  • Authentication. Entering a Google Account password is a major headache on a mobile device. After seeing how Microsoft Live for Mobile handles this I think Google could make things dramatically simpler and safer as follows:
    • Give your mobile number to Google Reader (they have mine already for Google Calendar alerts) and choose a short easy to enter mobile access PIN.
    • Google Reader then sends an SMS to that number containing a URL to page that only requires that PIN to authenticate you to your Google Reader Mobile page.
    • Expire the PIN after use\after a short time just to keep us all nice and safe.
  • Add the ability to add labels to either an item or a feed.
  • Add the ability to edit or add new labels and subscriptions.
  • Add a "Share This" hot key. The interface already support the following in its Item read view: 1 - See Original , 0 - Next in Your Reading List, * - Add a Star (duh!), # Keep Unread, plus links to your home page, tags, subscriptions and signing out. It's a no brainer to add 2 - Share This, and 3 - Add a Label to this item. doing so would not clutter the display.
[5] More Stats and access to the data behind those stats. I love the new stats that but I'd like some more.
  • I'd like to know what fraction of my activity had been carried out via the Mobile interface.
  • Word counts would be interesting. Feedback into the Search and Filter features at the top and you have a way to manage your feeds based on activity.
  • A live interface to the raw stats data data would enable some interesting mashups (especially if others, like Amazon, were to do the same).
[6] Feed Suggestions. The data mining potential of our reading patterns could enable some very effective suggestions (similar to the "Interesting Items for You" Google Gadget).

Thursday 18 January 2007

More Comet McNaught

It's definitely turned out to be the prettiest comet of my lifetime so far and I missed it - there are times when I really regret having left the southern hemisphere. Anyway here's a stunning shot of Comet McNaught taken by Kevin Crause yesterday in Mossel Bay, South Africa.

http://www.spaceweather.com/comets/mcnaught/17jan07/Crause2.jpg

Much more at spaceweather.com.

Wednesday 17 January 2007

You read it here first

I was quite chuffed to see that I commented on the (fairly obvious) fact that the iPhone isn't really "widescreen" within minutes of seeing it while most of the pro and not so pro web gadget commentators took more than a week to figure that out.

I'm also wondering if I should sue the New York Times for plagiarism - David Leonhardt's very good article "The Cost Of War" is remarkably similar to my "The Economics of War". OK to be fair he actually did a professional job on it and well, he can actually write but I could argue that:
  • He stole my title. Or his sub editor did, whatever.
  • He stole my idea of demonstrating how big a number $1trillion is by showing that you could eradicate entire diseases if you used it for that (rather than fighting a war)
  • OK so that's it.
Alright then he didn't really steal my ideas and I got the idea from Terry Jones' Grauniad article in the first place (although I did acknowledge that). In any case Leonhardt's article is excellent and it is really good to see the US MSM picking up on this theme - the criminal waste of half a trillion to a trillion dollars should be judged by the opportunity cost of that waste.

Friday 12 January 2007

Why does my WLAN not work?

Probably because I'm microwaving my dinner? I dont know whether most folks are aware of this or not but the average Microwave oven seriously leaks EM radiation in the 2.4Ghz frequency range and if you have a wireless LAN at home this might be a problem. It is probably also worth seeing the effect if you are concerned about radiation from cell phone masts because this stuff is a hell of a lot stronger than cell phones (range of kilowatts of radiation vs range of watts of radiation).

Anyway some snaps from tonight courtesy of my $100 WiSpy 2.4Ghz EM radiation detector. Great geek toy, every home should have one.

This is the signal with me copying down a very large file over WiFi Channel 6 (2.436 Ghz +-5 Mhz) Notice the very nice clean signal centered on channel 6.





























Then I turned on the Microwave. OK so the signal doesn't quite fall apart at the seams but it is quite shocking to see that the most conservative interpretation would say that the signal at 2.455 - 2.466 Ghz is completely annihilated by my Microwave and by and large there is major interference at all frequencies at or above 2.436 Ghz (Channel 6).